Parsifal at Covent Garden
- First Performance in England
- The Setting of the Opera
- The Performance
arsifal was first performed in England on 2 February 1914. This
review appeared in The Times on the following day. The author was H.C. Colles (1879-1943), the newspaper's music critic from 1911.
||Herr Paul Bender
||Mr Murray Davey
||Herr Paul Knüpfer
||Herr Heinrich Hensel
||Herr August Kiess
||Frau Eva von der Osten
||Herr Artur Bodansky
Paul Knüpfer as Gurnemanz,
recorded in 1914. Ogg format, mono, duration 6 min.
Left: A contemporary illustration of performers in the 1914 production of 'Parsifal' at Covent Garden (March 28, 1914 issue of the Illustrated London News
ueen Alexandra occupied the Royal box at the first performance in England
of Wagner's Parsifal, which took place at Covent Garden last night before a very distinguished audience.
he huge audience which filled every seat in the Opera House from the stalls to
the gallery was drawn there no doubt by every conceivable motive and interest, from a devotion bordering upon a religious enthusiasm to mere curiosity and the
desire to share in an historic event. Yet for practical purposes it could be divided into two definite classes, those who knew or thought they knew what
Parsifal is and those who had come to make the discovery.
oth classes no doubt had one question uppermost in their mind: the question how
far what they were to see and hear would be the Parsifal which until this year has remained secluded at Bayreuth. The question, though inevitable, is
destructive to the spirit which Wagner fought so hard to gain from his audience. He wanted what every artist wants and rarely gets, an attitude of concentrated
sympathy freed from all exterior distractions. He wanted an audience without poses either of piety or cleverness to whom he could speak direct. The conditions of
modern artistic production make the ideal unattainable, and while those who know Parsifal have by now answered the question each in his own way, it must
be our business to answer it to some extent for the benefit of the newcomers.
he forest scene, into which Kundry rushes, wild-eyed and breathless, bringing balsam for Amfortas' wound, and
where the boy Parsifal strays and thoughtlessly shoots the swan, gives a far more spacious view of
lake and mountain than can be shown at Bayreuth.
he temple in which the mystery of the Grail is celebrated
is, on the other hand, a very close representation of the Venetian [sic] architecture of the Bayreuth scene, but the point at which this production fails is the
moving scenery which Wagner intended should link the two. The idea was one of Wagner's worst blunders in practical stagecraft. He
directed that the whole scene should move gradually towards the right, and even when it is done perfectly it has some of the absurdity of the old-fashioned
panorama show. But when the scene does not move at all, but is gradually obliterated by a canvas on a roll (which is what happens at Covent Garden) the absurdity
is multiplied a hundredfold. If the management could have had the courage to prove Wagner wrong by omitting the moving scenery altogether, letting the journey to
Monsalvat be pictured imaginatively in the magnificent music of the orchestra, as Siegfried's journey to the Rhine is pictured, a
lasting service to Wagner's art would have been done ...
ut these things are really only the accessories. Every one realizes now
that the heart of Wagner's art lies in the music. The cast had been carefully chosen with this in view. Herr Hensel has sung the part of Parsifal in two Bayreuth festivals; Mme. Eva von der Osten is the possessor of one of the most beautiful mezzo-soprano voices of modern
times, and in Herr Paul Bender, Herr Knöpfer, and Herr Kiess were secured three of the finest singers possible. Individually the work of the principal artists was
of the highest order. But one looks for more than this, and through most of the performance we got more both in the careful ensemble and in the fine
orchestral playing. The opening scenes were the least satisfactory ...
he ending in which Parsifal raises the Grail, illumined as in the first act, produces an anticlimax musically as well as dramatically. Wagner's attempt to give it additional significance
by the descent of the dove produces no more than a cheap theatrical effect, and he has no new musical point to add in the score. In this as in much else one is
reminded of the fact that Parsifal is the work of his old age. His strength was ebbing, but the sincerity of his purpose sufficed to produce a work which
has created a deeper reverence for opera than any of his earlier masterpieces could achieve. Even if we do not feel Parsifal to be Wagner's greatest work,
its unique beauty and the loftiness of its standpoint are incontestable.
© Derrick Everett 1996-2018. This page last updated (changed body tag) --- Sun 11 February 2018 21:40:00 ---